Saba
said that the most essential and fundamental import of the holy Petek
is the revelation of Na Nach Nachma Nachman MeUman. Even long before
the revelation of the holy Petek, Rabbi Nussun already wrote and
published in the introduction to the introductory poem in the
beginning of Likutay Moharan that Rabbi Nachman's name is signed;
double, triple, and quadruple, which is a blatant reference to the
Song of the Future which is single, double, triple, and quadruple
which the holy Zohar revealed and presented applied to the Name of
Hashem: Y-YH-YHV-YHVH, as is brought down multiple times in Likutay
Moharan and expounded upon elaborately in Rabbi Nussun's Likutay
Halachos, and also prominently taught in the holy books of Rabbi
Nachman is the teaching of our Sages that the name of the Tzaddik
shares the Name of Hashem, and thus Rabbi Nussun already established
that the actual Song of the Future was the name of Rabbi Nachman in
this prescribed formation (for the name of Hashem includes
everything, and therefore the Zohar reveals the construct of the Song
with the name of Hashem, without revealing the specific and actual
song). Any and every true adherent of Breslov would have been very
familiar with this. Even still this is a very far cry from an actual
open declaration from Rabbi Nachman himself, stating explicitly that
he is Na NaCh NaChMa NaChMaN – which is only done in the holy
Petek. Saba also points out, that if not for the Petek we would know
Rabbi Nachman as being of Breslov, like the name of his Chasidus,
only in the Petek, Rabbi Nachman signs himself as being from Uman (In
addition to the profuse secrets, qualities, and powers of
incorporating “of Uman” in the signature of Nanach, it is also
further proof of the authenticity of the Petek not being the work of
a prankster, trying to pass off a note as being from Rabbi Nachman of
Breslov, it would be self-defeating to sign it with an unknown name.
It should also be noted, that many years after Saba's passing, a
small letter was found where Rabbi Nachman actually signed, Nachman
from Uman (spelling Uman with an Aleph – man (on earth)– whereas
in the holy Petek it is spelled “mn” like the spelling of the
manna which was from the heavens)).
This
calls for three studies. 1. The study of the Song of the Future based
on the teachings of our holy Sages o.b.m. who lived before Rabbi
Nachman. This will entail locating and providing sources where the
Sages discussed or mentioned the song. 2. The study of the song based
on the teachings of Rabbi Nachman before he revealed the Petek, and
also the teachings of Rabbi Nussun. Rabbi Nussun gave inordinate
remarkable attention to the Song of the Future, and he discusses it
perhaps thirty times, and presents various amazing explanations
sometimes at very great length. 3. The study of the actual song: Na
NaCh NaChMa NaChMaN MeUman. All of these studies include the four
studies of pishat (– the explanation, logical and as simple as
possible), remmez (hints), droosh (elaborations showing
interconnections and so forth), soad (secret, esoteric).
The
method of 1,2,3,4
Before
studying the actual Song of the Future, there is need for a brief
study of the method employed in the song, of writing a letter, then
going back to write it again with the second letter, and then going
back again to write the first three letters, and after to write all
four. In Kabbala this is called achoora'yim – the back, that is to
say just like a person has a face and a back, so too the names and
words have a face – their given name, with which they present
themselves outright, and their back, which is a shrouded, inhibited,
constrained presentation. The Kabbala teaches that when a higher
entity gives vitality to a lower entity, the lower entity does not
have the ability to receive directly – facing the higher entity,
and thus the higher entity gives the lower entity through its (the
higher entity's) achoora'yim (back). In this sense, the Song of the
Future would indicate the providing for lower entities. The Kabbala
and Chasidus makes it very clear that all the provisions come through
the Tzaddik, and thus it is very fitting for the Song of the Future
to be the name of the chief tzaddik of all times, Rabbi Nachman,
lowering himself to provide for all of creation.
There
is also a seemingly completely different approach to the function of
this method of arrangement, by presenting the letters in this
ascending formation, it builds, enforces, and empowers it. The Talmud
(Avoda Zura 12) that if a person is G”F in threat from the demon in
charge of the blindness who's name is ShABROoREe, he should say:
ShABROoREe, BROoREe, ROoREe, OoREe, REe, Yee, and Rashi explains that
when the demon hears his name being reduced letter after letter he
runs away. From here the Ben Ish Chay (Oad Yosef Chai, Drushos,
Parshas Buluk) asserts that by building a name letter by letter, in
the method of 1,2,3 one adds strength and power to it. The Ben Ish
Chay continues to propound an astounding novelty, that the entire
enterprise of King Buluk's hiring Bilaam was to recite the name
YiSROeL in the method of reduction mentioned above, and to recite
MOAV in the ascending formation of the first letter, first two, first
three etc. (as we do with Na NaCh). It is amazing that even without
knowledge of Nanach, the Ben Ish Chay realized the magnitude of this
method.
Even
though these two approaches seem almost contradictory, there is a
reconciliation presented in Likutay Moharan, Torah 62, where Rabbi
Nachman explains that on the one hand each repetition is hiding and
encasing the source from exterior predators, while at the same time
each progression builds its protective power, almost exponentially,
from its source. Thus when one conducts a fast, starving off the
spiritual predators, each progressive day is much more significant
because of how it is rooted from the very outset of the fast, and not
just a lone day of fasting. Thus fasting consecutive days greatly
builds the achievements of the fast to bind the back of the holiness
so that it is impregnable from exterior predators, and then the
holiness can present itself.
These
are the general concepts of this method of achoora'yim (-1,2,3,4),
but they do not rule out specific independent interpretations and
explanations. Thus there are many other ways of understanding the
progression of Na NaCh NaChMa NaChMaN MeUman.
No comments:
Post a Comment